<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Does HR Deserve a Place at the Table?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://caribhrforum.com/wordpress/2010/05/25/does-hr-deserve-a-place-at-the-table/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://caribhrforum.com/wordpress/2010/05/25/does-hr-deserve-a-place-at-the-table/</link>
	<description>For Human Resource Professionals in the Caribbean</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 24 Aug 2011 00:08:32 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Felicia</title>
		<link>http://caribhrforum.com/wordpress/2010/05/25/does-hr-deserve-a-place-at-the-table/comment-page-1/#comment-1886</link>
		<dc:creator>Felicia</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Jun 2010 15:16:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://caribhrforum.com/wordpress/?p=374#comment-1886</guid>
		<description>Nathan,

Thank you so much for &#039;telling it like it is&#039;.  I totally agree about the need to identify the Mission (purpose for why the company exists).  This is something that, as you state others, not only HR, struggle with - all too often I have seen Executive and Senior Management misunderstand the importance of Mission, seeing it as one of those &#039;management tools&#039; that&#039;s a fad and has no real bearing on &#039;the business&#039; clearly your Kodak case study shows otherwise.

As for HR understanding their role in the business - I agree HR needs to look beyond the defined roles in the various &#039;business partner&#039; models, reality is Organizations are dynamic and needs change and HR must be skilled enough and, Visionary enough to deliver what is needed, whether it&#039;s traditionally seen as their role or not. To do that as you point out we need as Hr practitioners to develop some key competencies, which apply not only to HR- but leaders generally; now there&#039;s a thought...if we have the same skills sets as leaders shouldn&#039;t it be a given that we &#039;have a seat at the table&#039; to make use of those skills!!!!

Once again great article.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nathan,</p>
<p>Thank you so much for &#8216;telling it like it is&#8217;.  I totally agree about the need to identify the Mission (purpose for why the company exists).  This is something that, as you state others, not only HR, struggle with &#8211; all too often I have seen Executive and Senior Management misunderstand the importance of Mission, seeing it as one of those &#8216;management tools&#8217; that&#8217;s a fad and has no real bearing on &#8216;the business&#8217; clearly your Kodak case study shows otherwise.</p>
<p>As for HR understanding their role in the business &#8211; I agree HR needs to look beyond the defined roles in the various &#8216;business partner&#8217; models, reality is Organizations are dynamic and needs change and HR must be skilled enough and, Visionary enough to deliver what is needed, whether it&#8217;s traditionally seen as their role or not. To do that as you point out we need as Hr practitioners to develop some key competencies, which apply not only to HR- but leaders generally; now there&#8217;s a thought&#8230;if we have the same skills sets as leaders shouldn&#8217;t it be a given that we &#8216;have a seat at the table&#8217; to make use of those skills!!!!</p>
<p>Once again great article.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

